Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

FoundationDB is an Apple thing, isn’t it? Might explain why. It feels kinda like they’ve put it out there and it just hasn’t had anyone with a marketing budget to push it along.


It started as a proprietary database. Apple acquired it and then open sourced it eventually.


Didn't it start as an open source database? then apple acquired it and made it close sourced, then open sourced it again after several years.

It is weird that this DB has a good reputation which doesn't match its popularity.


FoundationDB was the first publicly available distributed transactional KV on the market that I can recall. It wasn’t “open” though - always proprietary. They generated a lot of hype and good press for being this NoSQL DB that was all about ACID correctness in the age of “mongo is webscale (by writing to /dev/null)”. They had a demo showing impressive throughout on a low power cluster with no data loss during a power cycle. I think that despite generally impressive tech they had some trouble selling but did end up selling the company to Apple.


No, it was not open source prior to Apple releasing it as Apache 2.0 in April of 2018.


The source was licensed to some people but it wasn’t open source IIRC.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: