Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I expect it would be far cheaper to scale up tempo/loki than it would be to even run an idle kafka cluster. This feels like spending thousands of dollars to save tens of dollars.


Querying in Tempo/Loki does seem to not scale particularly well, and Loki has known issues with high cardinality data, so...


Tempo can still buckle under huge bursts of traffic, and you don’t need the retention to be in the hours


When handling surges of the order of 10x, it's much more difficult to scale the different components of loki than to write them to Kafka/Redpanda first and consume at a consistent rate.


Where are you finding such an expensive Kafka cluster? Kafka can run on 3 VPS's in a trenchcoat.




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2026 batch! Applications are open till July 27.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: