Yeah, "Calm down everyone, the only issue here is that certain jurisdictions have sensible definitions that mean we can't legally claim we're not selling data because we are" is arguably clarifying but it's not particularly comforting.
Seems safest to assume that if it can be tracked, it will be. And traded too.
If they intended to clarify wording, they would have added something in place of their original wording instead of deleting it entirely. Legal team isn't slipping like that.
Seems safest to assume that if it can be tracked, it will be. And traded too.